🔗 Share this article

US prosecutors have claimed that a Libyan suspect freely admitted to being involved in operations against Americans, encompassing the 1988's Lockerbie bombing and an aborted conspiracy to target a American politician using a explosive-laden garment.

Admission Particulars

Abu Agila Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi is alleged to have acknowledged his involvement in the murder of 270 victims when the aircraft was brought down over the Scottish community of Lockerbie, during interrogation in a Libyan detention facility in 2012.

Identified as the defendant, the elderly man has claimed that several masked individuals pressured him to make the statement after menacing him and his family.

His lawyers are trying to stop it from being employed as evidence in his legal proceedings in Washington in the coming year.

Courtroom Battle

In answer, attorneys from the US Department of Justice have said they can demonstrate in court that the confession was "unforced, reliable and truthful."

The existence of Mas'ud's alleged admission was initially revealed in the year 2020, when the American authorities stated it was charging him with creating and priming the IED employed on Flight 103.

Defendant's Allegations

The family man is alleged of being a former official in Libya's intelligence service and has been in US detention since 2022.

He has entered not responsible to the accusations and is scheduled to stand trial at the US court for the Washington DC in spring.

Mas'ud's attorneys are working to block the court from hearing about the statement and have submitted a petition asking for it to be withheld.

They contend it was obtained under pressure following the uprising which removed the Libyan leader in the early 2010s.

Alleged Intimidation

They claim previous members of the leader's regime were being victimized with unlawful deaths, seizures and torture when Mas'ud was abducted from his home by weapon-carrying individuals the subsequent period.

He was moved to an unregistered holding location where additional inmates were allegedly abused and harmed and was alone in a cramped space when several hooded persons gave him a one sheet of paper.

His lawyers said its scripted contents started with an command that he was to admit to the Pan Am Flight 103 attack and an additional terror attack.

Major Extremist Events

The defendant states he was told to memorise what it said about the events and recite it when he was questioned by someone else the next day.

Being concerned for his safety and that of his offspring, he claimed he believed he had no choice but to acquiesce.

In their answer to the defendant's request, lawyers from the US Department of Justice have declared the tribunal was being requested to suppress "extremely pertinent proof" of Mas'ud's guilt in "two significant terror incidents targeting US citizens."

Prosecution Rebuttals

They assert the defendant's version of occurrences is unconvincing and untrue, and assert that the details of the statement can be verified by reliable external proof collected over several years.

The government attorneys claim the defendant and other former personnel of the dictator's intelligence agency were detained in a hidden holding center run by a armed group when they were interrogated by an experienced Libya's police officer.

They contend that in the turmoil of the post-uprising era, the location was "the protected environment" for Mas'ud and the additional agents, accounting for the conflict and opposition feeling prevailing at the time.

Investigation Details

Per to the investigator who interrogated the suspect, the center was "properly managed", the prisoners were not bound and there were no evidence of abuse or coercion.

The investigator has claimed that over two days, a composed and fit Mas'ud explained his role in the explosions of Pan Am 103.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has also stated he had acknowledged creating a device which detonated in a German venue in the mid-1980s, causing the deaths of several people, including multiple American servicemen, and injuring numerous more.

Further Claims

He is also reported to have recounted his involvement in an plot on the lives of an unidentified American Secretary of State at a public event in Pakistan.

The defendant is reported to have described that someone with the US official was bearing a explosive-laden overcoat.

It was the suspect's task to detonate the device but he decided not to proceed after finding out that the individual bearing the coat did not know he was on a suicide mission.

He opted "not to activate the button" although his supervisor in the agency being with him at the time and questioning what was {going on|happening|occurring